∑math20

Algebra · Result 197

A torsion-free group algebra that is not directly finite

4 papersLeanreasoning

Constructs a finitely presented torsion-free nonsofic group whose group algebra over 𝔽2 is not directly finite, disproving Kaplansky's conjecture even without torsion. Companion examples give injective nonsurjective cellular automata on all configurations, refuting Gottschalk's surjunctivity conjecture. Another counterexample is an integral group-ring matrix, invertible over the rational group ring, with Fuglede–Kadison determinant strictly between zero and one, disproving the unrestricted Determinant Conjecture.

Watch

▶Introduction: the problem and why it mattersin preparation
▶The presented solutionin preparation

Papers 4

First page of A Torsion-Free Group Algebra That Is Not Directly Finite

A Torsion-Free Group Algebra That Is Not Directly Finite

OpenAI · October 4, 2026

We construct a finitely presented torsion-free counterexample to Kaplansky's direct finiteness conjecture over the field of two elements. The group admits a finite two-dimensional classifying complex.

Read PDF Download Source

Cite
@misc{OAI:A-Torsion-Free-Group-Algebra-That-Is-Not-Directly-Finite-October-4-2026,
  author = {{OpenAI}},
  title = {{A Torsion-Free Group Algebra That Is Not Directly Finite}},
  howpublished = {OpenAI Math Release preprint
                  \href{https://github.com/openai/math/blob/main/preprints/A-Torsion-Free-Group-Algebra-That-Is-Not-Directly-Finite-October-4-2026/direct-finiteness.pdf}{OAI:A-Torsion-Free-Group-Algebra-That-Is-Not-Directly-Finite-October-4-2026}},
  year = {2026}
}
First page of A Counterexample to Kaplansky's Direct-Finiteness Conjecture in Characteristic Two

A Counterexample to Kaplansky's Direct-Finiteness Conjecture in Characteristic Two

OpenAI · September 23, 2026

We disprove Kaplansky's direct-finiteness conjecture by constructing a finite field K of characteristic two, a finitely presented group G, and finite sums \(a,b\in K[G]\) with \(ab=1\) but \(ba\ne1\). The group G is nonsofic. The same elements define a cellular automaton on KG that is injective but not surjective, disproving Gottschalk's surjunctivity conjecture.

Read PDF Download Source

Cite
@misc{OAI:A-Counterexample-to-Kaplanskys-Direct-Finiteness-Conjecture-in-Characteristic-Two-September-23-2026,
  author = {{OpenAI}},
  title = {{A Counterexample to Kaplansky's Direct-Finiteness Conjecture in Characteristic Two}},
  howpublished = {OpenAI Math Release preprint
                  \href{https://github.com/openai/math/blob/main/preprints/A-Counterexample-to-Kaplanskys-Direct-Finiteness-Conjecture-in-Characteristic-Two-September-23-2026/paper.pdf}{OAI:A-Counterexample-to-Kaplanskys-Direct-Finiteness-Conjecture-in-Characteristic-Two-September-23-2026}},
  year = {2026}
}
First page of A Counterexample to the Group-Ring Determinant Conjecture

A Counterexample to the Group-Ring Determinant Conjecture

OpenAI · September 23, 2026

We disprove the unrestricted group-ring Determinant Conjecture. We construct a finitely generated group G and a square matrix over \(\mathbb Z[G]\) that is invertible over \(\mathbb Q[G]\) and has Fuglede–Kadison determinant strictly between zero and one. The logarithmic integral defining the determinant is finite.

Read PDF Download Source

Cite
@misc{OAI:A-Counterexample-to-the-Group-Ring-Determinant-Conjecture-September-23-2026,
  author = {{OpenAI}},
  title = {{A Counterexample to the Group-Ring Determinant Conjecture}},
  howpublished = {OpenAI Math Release preprint
                  \href{https://github.com/openai/math/blob/main/preprints/A-Counterexample-to-the-Group-Ring-Determinant-Conjecture-September-23-2026/paper.pdf}{OAI:A-Counterexample-to-the-Group-Ring-Determinant-Conjecture-September-23-2026}},
  year = {2026}
}
First page of A Counterexample to Kaplansky's Direct-Finiteness Conjecture in Odd Characteristic

A Counterexample to Kaplansky's Direct-Finiteness Conjecture in Odd Characteristic

OpenAI · September 26, 2026

We construct a counterexample to Kaplansky's direct-finiteness conjecture in odd characteristic. For one specified odd prime p, we obtain a field K of order p4, a finitely generated group G containing torsion, and finite sums \(a,b\in K[G]\) with \(ab=1\) but \(ba\ne1\). The same elements define a cellular automaton on KG that is injective but not surjective.

Read PDF Download Source

Cite
@misc{OAI:A-Counterexample-to-Kaplanskys-Direct-Finiteness-Conjecture-in-Odd-Characteristic-September-26-2026,
  author = {{OpenAI}},
  title = {{A Counterexample to Kaplansky's Direct-Finiteness Conjecture in Odd Characteristic}},
  howpublished = {OpenAI Math Release preprint
                  \href{https://github.com/openai/math/blob/main/preprints/A-Counterexample-to-Kaplanskys-Direct-Finiteness-Conjecture-in-Odd-Characteristic-September-26-2026/paper.pdf}{OAI:A-Counterexample-to-Kaplanskys-Direct-Finiteness-Conjecture-in-Odd-Characteristic-September-26-2026}},
  year = {2026}
}

What was formalized in Lean

The following describes the scope of the Lean formalization related to the following accompanying paper(s):

Scope

Kaplansky's direct-finiteness conjecture asserts that \(ab=1\) implies \(ba=1\) for \(a,b\in K[G]\), for every field \(K\) and group \(G\). The formalized results construct a finite field of characteristic two and a group algebra violating this implication. One statement records the counterexample for a finitely generated group; the more detailed construction gives a finitely presented group with an element of odd prime order.

The detailed construction also gives a precise recipe for choosing the data and proves that the required search terminates. The further conclusion that the group is nonsofic is outside these statements.

A nonsingular integer matrix has absolute determinant at least \(1\). The group-ring Determinant Conjecture extends this bound to matrices over \(\mathbb Z[G]\) for every discrete group \(G\). If \(T_A\) is the operator induced by such a matrix \(A\) on finite direct sums of \(\ell^2(G)\), and \(\mu_A\) is the spectral measure of \(T_A^*T_A\) with respect to the group trace, the conjecture asserts

\(\displaystyle \int_{(0,\infty)}\log t\,d\mu_A(t)\ge0,\)

with the zero spectral atom omitted. For an invertible square matrix, this is equivalent to its Fuglede–Kadison determinant being at least \(1\).

The formalized result contradicts that bound. It gives a finitely generated group \(G\) and an \(n\times n\) matrix over \(\mathbb Z[G]\), with \(n\ge1\), that is invertible over \(\mathbb Q[G]\). Its bounded left-regular operator is invertible and has determinant strictly between \(0\) and \(1\).

The formalization uses the trace of \(\log(T^*T)\) to define the determinant for the invertible operator \(T\). The paper's additional spectral-measure integral conclusion is not included.

Kaplansky's direct-finiteness conjecture asserts that \(ab=1\) implies \(ba=1\) in every group algebra over a field. Let \(p\) be the smallest prime divisor of \(\bigl(\binom{1200}{600}!\bigr)^2+1\); this prime is odd. The formalized result constructs a field \(K\) of order \(p^4\), a finitely generated group \(G\) with torsion, and elements \(a,b\) violating this implication. The associated cellular automaton on all configurations \(K^G\) is injective but not surjective.

The formalization also contains fixed-field transfer results, separate from the statement linked below.

Comparator links

ResultComparator statement
Finitely presented characteristic-two counterexampleKaplanskyFinitelyPresented.lean
Characteristic-two direct-finiteness counterexampleKaplanskyDirectFiniteness.lean
Group-ring determinant counterexampleGroupRingDeterminant.lean
Prescribed odd-characteristic counterexampleOddKaplansky.lean

Scope note on GitHub →

Reasoning summary

OpenAI released an abridged summary of the model's reasoning for this result: Kaplansky's direct-finiteness conjecture in characteristic two (PDF).