∑math20

Theoretical computer science · Result 122

Quantitative trace-reconstruction bounds with a uniform decoder

3 papersLean

At every fixed deletion probability in \((0,1)\), reconstructing an arbitrary length-n binary string requires \(n^{\Omega(\log\log n)}\) independent traces, ruling out polynomial-sample reconstruction. A uniform decoder achieves quasipolynomial sample and running-time bounds for known fixed rational retention probabilities. When the deletion probability is at most \(n^{-\varepsilon}\) for fixed ε > 0, both bounds become polynomial in the input and parameter encoding.

Watch

1

The problem

What is being asked, where it comes from, and why it is hard. No proof needed.

▶Introduction to the problemin preparation
2

The solution proposed by OpenAI

How the paper solves it, step by step.

Full explanation
▶The proposed solutionin preparation

Papers 3

First page of Uniform quasipolynomial-time trace reconstruction

Uniform quasipolynomial-time trace reconstruction

OpenAI · October 5, 2026

We give a uniform algorithm that reconstructs every binary string from independent deletion traces when its length and rational retention probability are known. For each fixed retention probability, both the number of traces and the bit complexity are quasipolynomial in the string length. More generally, we give an explicit sample bound uniform over all rational retention probabilities, with running time polynomial in the sample budget and the binary input length. If the deletion probability is at most \(n^{-\varepsilon}\) for fixed ε > 0, the sample and running-time bounds are polynomial. Reconstruction succeeds with probability at least 2/3 for each input string.

Read PDF Download Source

Cite
@misc{OAI:Uniform-quasipolynomial-time-trace-reconstruction-October-5-2026,
  author = {{OpenAI}},
  title = {{Uniform quasipolynomial-time trace reconstruction}},
  howpublished = {OpenAI Math Release preprint
                  \href{https://github.com/openai/math/blob/main/preprints/Uniform-quasipolynomial-time-trace-reconstruction-October-5-2026/uniform-trace-reconstruction.pdf}{OAI:Uniform-quasipolynomial-time-trace-reconstruction-October-5-2026}},
  year = {2026}
}
First page of A latest-anchor induction with spectrally compact masks for worst-case trace reconstruction

A latest-anchor induction with spectrally compact masks for worst-case trace reconstruction

OpenAI · October 5, 2026

We give an improved worst-case sample bound for reconstructing a string from independent deletion traces, with its length and retention probability known. For each fixed retention probability, the number of traces is quasipolynomial: the logarithm of the sample budget is \(O((\log n)^3(1+\log\log(2n))^6)\). If the deletion probability is at most \(n^{-\varepsilon}\) for fixed ε > 0, polynomially many traces suffice. These bounds apply to binary strings and to strings of general symbols observed exactly. They concern sample complexity and do not assert an efficient reconstruction algorithm or matching optimality.

Read PDF Download Source

Cite
@misc{OAI:A-latest-anchor-induction-with-spectrally-compact-masks-for-worst-case-trace-reconstruction-October-5-2026,
  author = {{OpenAI}},
  title = {{A latest-anchor induction with spectrally compact masks for worst-case trace reconstruction}},
  howpublished = {OpenAI Math Release preprint
                  \href{https://github.com/openai/math/blob/main/preprints/A-latest-anchor-induction-with-spectrally-compact-masks-for-worst-case-trace-reconstruction-October-5-2026/paper.pdf}{OAI:A-latest-anchor-induction-with-spectrally-compact-masks-for-worst-case-trace-reconstruction-October-5-2026}},
  year = {2026}
}
First page of Quantitative lower bounds for trace reconstruction

Quantitative lower bounds for trace reconstruction

OpenAI · September 24, 2026

Exact worst-case reconstruction of a binary word from independent deletion traces requires \(n^{\Omega(\log\log n)}\) samples for every fixed deletion probability \(q\in(0,1)\), even with unrestricted computation and any fixed positive success probability. This gives a negative answer to the polynomial-sample question for binary trace reconstruction. More generally, when \(q^3\log n\to\infty\), we prove a lower bound of \(n^{c\log(q^3\log n)}\) samples for every fixed \(0\lt c\lt 1/(4\log2)\). Here q is the known deletion probability, and all logarithms are natural.

Read PDF Download Source

Cite
@misc{OAI:quantitative-lower-bounds-for-trace-reconstruction-September-24-2026,
  author = {{OpenAI}},
  title = {{Quantitative lower bounds for trace reconstruction}},
  howpublished = {OpenAI Math Release preprint
                  \href{https://github.com/openai/math/blob/main/preprints/quantitative-lower-bounds-for-trace-reconstruction-September-24-2026/paper.pdf}{OAI:quantitative-lower-bounds-for-trace-reconstruction-September-24-2026}},
  year = {2026}
}

What was formalized in Lean

The following describes the scope of the Lean formalization related to the following accompanying paper(s):

Scope

The formalization proves superpolynomial sample lower bounds for exact worst-case reconstruction of binary words from independent deletion traces, with unrestricted computation and any fixed positive success probability. For every fixed deletion probability \(q\in(0,1)\), sample complexity grows faster than every fixed power of the word length; the minimum total-variation distance between two one-trace laws decays faster than every inverse power.

More quantitatively, along sequences with \(q^3\log n\to\infty\), the required number of samples is at least \(n^{c\log(q^3\log n)}\) eventually for every fixed \(0<c<1/(4\log2)\). All logarithms are natural.

Comparator links

ResultComparator statement
Quantitative and superpolynomial sample lower bounds for trace reconstructionTraceReconstruction.lean

Scope note on GitHub →